There is no way on God's beautiful earth I can tell how I felt the day I was sitting at my
    computer, browsing and had my eyes fall an article entitled
    "Everyone's Going To Heaven" It was simply the mercy and sovereignty of God that
    allowed me to see it. That is how I found out that there is a large number of people in
    the world who do not believe that anyone is going to spend eternity in a place of pain
    and torture like the hell I thought existed.

    Some call this teaching Ultimate Reconciliation or Universal Salvation. I just like to
    call it the gospel. That's what Paul called it.

    I have that article below and you can read it. For clarity I am including a disclaimer on
    the first statement of the article. While I believe all will be saved, I don't believe all
    are saved yet. However, I do believe all are reconciled. As people realize their own
    inabilty to live up to righteous standards, and, as they understand what Christ did on
    the cross for everyone, believing becomes almost an automatic response. To me,
    reconciliation is the work of Christ on the Cross for all of humanity while salvation is
    the individual's coming into understanding of that work and accepting it as his own.
    Simply, calling on the Lord and being saved.



                                             "Everyone's Going to Heaven"

    Gospel of inclusion' says Jesus saves, but no declaration of belief in him as Savior is
    necessary for salvation.By Natalie Nichols Gillespie ;Reprinted with permission of
    Charisma News Service

    Despite a mass exodus of his congregation and a large drop in numbers at his annual
    Azusa summer conference, Bishop Carlton Pearson of Tulsa, Okla., has said he will
    stand by his commitment to preach a "more appealing and attractive message of
    God's unconditional love for all" In a lengthy interview with "Charisma" magazine, the
    pastor of the more than 5,000-member Higher Dimensions Family Church offered a
    revealing look at his ministry's current standing in the wake of his recent shift to what
    has been called the "gospel of inclusion" -- a doctrine that states no declaration of
    belief in Christ as Savior is necessary for going to heaven.Pearson's preaching
    caused a split in his congregation three years ago. Four pastors left and founded
    other churches. The bishop came under widespread public scrutiny earlier this year
    after he lost a bid for mayor of Tulsa and after a May article in "Charisma" called
    attention to his new doctrinal stance.His annual conference has always averaged
    7,500 to 10,000 people a night, he said, but not this summer. "This year, we never had
    a crowd above 4,500. In my church, people left by the hundreds. We probably lost
    thousands. But some are already coming back," he said.Although he does not like the
    term "inclusion" Pearson said he does believe that Jesus' death and resurrection
    paid the price for all the world to spend eternal life in heaven, without the
    requirement that people repent, confess and receive their salvation.Citing verses in
    Hebrews, Romans, Isaiah, Timothy and Revelation, among others, Pearson said
    Scripture clearly shows that the vast multitudes; will be in heaven. He interprets that
    to mean most of the world, not just the 20 percent or so of the world's population who
    are Roman Catholic or Protestant or who claim to be born again.I have been
    preaching this for several years, he told Charisma."It's not 'new.'"  But evidently
    someone heard it who was not a regular part of this congregation and didn't
    understand; Pearson said he is not the only one introducing what he labels a
    "paradigm shift." Other pastors also preach a gospel that includes the world, calling
    themselves Universal Reconciliationists, he said.Pearson preaches that God loves
    all, that Jesus died for all and that any decision to live for Jesus is between the
    person and the Lord and is not within any preacher's realm or responsibility to
    convert. Only Jesus saves.Where Pearson veers from evangelical doctrinal norms is
    in stating that human beings are neither required nor given a choice to determine
    their eternal destiny. The presumption is they will go to heaven. Only those who have
    tasted of the fruits; of real intimacy with Christ and have ;intentionally and
    consciously rejected the grace of God will spend eternity separated from Him.Other
    pastors have asked to have Pearson removed from the speaking lineup of
    conferences, such as the August Prophetic Awakening 2002 in Fresno, Calif. Integrity
    Music has been weighing a decision on whether to release Pearson's new Azusa: We
    Cry Out album to the Christian and mainstream markets.Pearson has said he is open
    to loving correction; if he can be shown that he is off-base. However, he admits he
    has been hurt by the outright rejection by high-profile leaders who have not even
    spoken to him directly. ;I've lost some of the dearest, most respected friendships I've
    ever had, Pearson said. But even though they misunderstand or misinterpret me, I
    still highly value them.;Pearson said he plans to hold a Contending for the Faith
    conference at Higher Dimensions Oct. 2-4 to answer questions and clear up any
    misunderstandings about the teaching of universal reconciliation (my husband and I
    attended this conference in Tulsa and it was like a revelation of God's grace all over again.)

    Bishop Pearson has a new book out called "God Is Not A Christian". Read the excerpt
    from that book and you will see that he has not strayed from the gospel, just the
    "fleshly comforts" of tradition.

    Here is the excerpt:

                                                  The Gospel of Inclusion


    “In the universe, there are things known, and things that are unknown, and in
    between there are doors.”The presentation I am about to submit to you is a work in
    progress. I have been working on and through the development of these thoughts
    and reflections now, for over 25 years, and more openly and perhaps aggressively
    the last four or five. It is a work of faith and conviction-a mindset I have
    unsuccessfully tried to either avoid or delay fully accepting.

    This presentation is part of my witness and testimony, as one who desires to both
    minister and worship as a citizen of the modern world and be able to think as I do so. I
    write it as a person to whom the Christian Church, particularly the
    Pentecostal/Charismatic Community has accorded honor, rank, and the privilege of
    leadership in the Episcopal office. It comes, thus, from the life of a Bishop, Pastor,
    Evangelist and Christian Diplomat, whose vows at the time of ordination and
    consecration included both a promise to defend the faith and to guard the unity and
    sanctity of the Church.

    I should like to say before you read any further, that you will read nothing in this
    theology that should be considered “anti-Christian” or that undermines the powerful
    work of the cross, the deity of Christ and His substitutionary death, or the shedding
    of His precious blood for the remission of sins.

    You will read nothing that challenges the fact of Jesus’ Virgin birth, that He suffered
    and died on the cross for the sins of the world, that He was buried and rose again
    and is presently seated at the right hand of the throne of God, where He ever
    intercedes for the saints and will ultimately return to receive into eternal life with
    Him, the fruit of His “Finished Work” at Calvary, demonstrated by His unconditional
    love, grace and reconciliation of all things.

    As a 4th generation Classical Pentecostal preacher, brought up in the tradition of
    “holiness or hell” convictions and consciousness, I will admit that over the last nearly
    30 years since coming into the larger Charismatic world, and after graduating from
    High School in 1971 and moving to Tulsa, Oklahoma, to attend Oral Roberts
    University, I have finally come to the end of a road or perhaps just a turn in it, with
    regard to my presupposed thinking about God, the universe and how I relate to Him
    in it, especially with regard to heaven, hell, the purpose of the Church and my role as
    a minister in it and “doing the work of an evangelist.”

    I have preached to thousands-leading them to accept and confess Christ. I have
    fasted from as little as half a day, when I was as young as 7 or 8 years old, to as many
    as 40 days as an adult, seeking the anointing to reach lost souls and bring people to
    deliverance and a saving-knowledge of Christ. I have preached to hundreds of
    thousands, both in person, as well as to millions by way of television and radio. I’ve
    ordained Deacons and Elders, installed Pastors, consecrated Bishops, recorded
    successful albums and CDs, written books, hosted some of the largest conferences
    and gatherings of the people of God.

    However, in the midst of all my work and my unmitigated commitment to the Lord
    Jesus Christ and my life’s dedication to the ministry of His great Gospel, I have come
    to a most liberating and encouraging realization, both through Scripture and personal
    revelation. This revelation was put best in words, while I was hosting a live national
    Christian television program and my guest was the great Missionary Evangelist, T.L.
    Osborn. In the course of this interview with one of the greatest soul winners of the
    20th century, he blurts out a statement that burned into my spirit in a way no other
    single statement has, in my over 45 years as a born-again Christian. The statement
    was: “The world is already saved, they just don’t know it!”

    According to my subsequent studies of Scriptures to verify this statement as a true
    and a most powerful and inspiring revelation, I had to face the fact that, not only does
    the world not know it, but, most of the Evangelical church doesn’t believe it, and
    therein lies the greatest deception the enemy has ever convinced the world of,
    second only to his success at deceiving Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

    In the Biblical and Classical Christian theology, Salvation is sometimes pictured in a
    restrictive sense, belonging only to those who respond in faith-(Matthew 25:31-46
    ‘sheep and goats’, ‘the least of my brothers’, (v. 41) and John 3:16, 17, and several
    more. A more careful study of Scriptures will reveal that Salvation is also and perhaps
    more often or more comprehensively pictured in a universally inclusive way, in which
    God is Redeemer of the whole world or creation, including all human beings.
    (Philippians 2:5-11, Colossians 1:15-20, Revelation 5:13, I Timothy 4:9-10, I John 2:1-2,
    John 1:29, Romans 5:12-14-21, II Corinthians 5:12-21, Romans 11:32).

    Christianity centers on the Person and work of the God-man, our Lord and Savior,
    Jesus Christ. He is the touchstone and power of all Truth. Any seeming truth that
    does not glorify Him as such is counterfeit, or only partly true. I earnestly stand for
    the right of private interpretation, judgment and guidance of God in an illuminated
    conscience; yet, at the same time, I desire to apprehend with all the saints, what is
    the breadth and length and the depth and height, and to know the love of Christ
    which passes all knowledge, the truest and most accurate perception.


    There are fewer matters more urgent in a pluralistic culture than the centrality and
    centricity of the Cross. The meaning of the cross and resurrection is not only that
    God loves, but also that He has the power and the will to overcome evil, not just
    personally as Jesus did, but to do so universally or cosmically, and bring victory out
    of what could only be described as eternal defeat. To believe that such a God could
    or would permit a single soul He created, to be destroyed, or even eternally
    separated from Him is a contradiction in terms. It would also be an inadmissible
    defeat for God.

    Just a common-sense acknowledgment of the Sovereignty of God would make it
    almost impossible to be reconciled to the thought that God could have created a
    world and man or mankind if, in fact, He foresaw hell as an eternal destination for any
    He created in His image and likeness. It would mean that creation is essentially a
    failure and the earth project a farce. Moreover, a God, who deliberately allows the
    uninterrupted existence of endless or eternal torments, is not God at all, but more
    like what we describe as the devil. If the atonement means the reconciliation of God
    and man or man to God, (and that is the only thing it can mean), then it must end in
    universal salvation or redemption of humankind.

    What’s Wrong with This Picture?

    The is the most religiously diverse nation in the world. Christianity is by far the
    greatest single element in that diversity. According to recent statistics, 70% of
    Americans belong to some brand of Christian religion. What may be even more
    distinctive is that it is certainly the most religiously diverse country that has ever
    existed, in terms of voluntary participation in the expressions of faith and the
    freedom to do so. In light of this, it seems interesting that  has by far the largest
    prison population in the civilized world. And Tulsa, the city I live in, known to some as
    the “buckle of the Bible belt” has the 2nd largest divorce rate in the country-second
    only to Las Vegas. In addition, I regret to mention that we have, as well, one of the
    nation’s largest recorded “out-of-wedlock” teenage pregnancies and a higher than
    normal per-capita homosexual population to boot. Such statistics should cause any
    critically thinking person to ask, “What’s wrong with this picture?”

    After 30 years of preaching holiness, with the accompanying hellfire and brimstone
    warnings to final judgments and eternal damnation, I have been arrested by the Holy
    Spirit and convinced that I have not been preaching an accurate Gospel message
    and that overall, the Christian Evangelical church has become more indicting than
    inviting and should be less attacking and do more attracting of those spiritually
    unresolved. In addition, I have been emphatically reminded of the writer of Hebrews
    admonition in chapter 6 verses 1-3, that we leave the elementary teachings of
    (fundamental Christianity) and go on to perfection (maturity).I’m sure you will admit
    that there is hardly an Evangelical church anywhere in America that, should you visit
    them on Sunday morning, the message would be along the lines of one of the
    doctrines the Hebrew author lists as things we should leave, to go on to maturity, (i.e.
    “repentance from acts that lead to death”, “faith in God”, instructions about
    “baptisms”, “laying on of hands”, “resurrection from the dead” and “eternal

    While all these are important subjects, I’m sure we’d all agree that most of us have
    mastered them in one form or another and can preach or teach them (so to speak)
    blindfolded and walking backwards.
    The mysterious idea of, “going on to maturity,” has many in the larger Evangelical
    Christian, and even the Charismatic/Pentecostal community intimidated. Why?
    Because mature Christianity insists on removing the fear tactic used to persuade
    children or the immature, to eat, drink and obey their parents, or in this case, the
    Word of God.

    Mature Christianity demands “mature (perfect) love, the kind that casts out fear, the
    fear that torments (really tortures) the believer and cripples his trust in God’s ability
    to love unconditionally (1 John 3:18). Verse 17 in this same chapter of 1 John
    suggests that Love is the one thing that gives us confidence on the “day of
    Judgment,” which in many ways seems to be the greatest fear I am confronted with by
    those who oppose the Gospel of Inclusion. The looming question indelibly etched in
    the mind of many (most) believers is, “What will happen on Judgment Day and will
    they make it to heaven?” We all say “we love Him because He first loved us,” (1 John
    4:19), but while we seem confident enough that He “first loved us,” many are quite
    unsure whether or not He will “last love us” or love us at the last or at last, love us.
    Sometimes I think it’s much easier to speak what we believe to be true, than to
    “speak the truth in Love.” (Ephesians 4:12)


    A Christian can be a Universalist, but not all Universalists are Christians, and I think
    this distinction may be where I have run into the greatest opposition. What actually is
    modern Universalism, or in my particular case, the Gospel of Inclusion?

    My research has brought me to any number of similar, but varying definitions of
    Universalism, but for the purpose of this particular discussion, I will use the
    definition I believe best or most accurately typifies my understanding of the
    “Finished Work” of Christ and the Cross-the work of redeeming or reconciling
    humankind, moreover, the entire world, all of creation, back to God. A Christocentric
    Universalism (as distinguished from a humanistic or Unitarian Universalism) seems to
    be gaining ground and interest among the more critical thinkers in Christianity. The
    basis for this trend lies in a deeper realization of the powerful implications of the
    incarnation of Jesus Christ for the nature of God.

    Universal Reconciliation

    The theory of Universal Reconciliation (the Gospel of Inclusion) maintains that Christ’
    s death accomplished its purpose of reconciling all mankind to God. The death of
    Christ made it possible for God to accept man and, in fact, and indeed, He has done
    so. The substitutional death of Christ not only made it possible for God to accept
    mankind as totally clean before Him but, more importantly, it demonstrated or proved
    God’s unconditional love for His own creative handiwork. As a result, whatever
    separation now exists between man and the benefits of God’s grace is subjective in
    nature; it is illusionary, existing only in man’s unregenerate mind, his unenlightened
    or uniformed way of thinking. The message (Good News or Gospel) people need to
    hear, is not that they simply have an opportunity for Salvation, but that they, through
    Christ, in fact, have already been redeemed, reconciled and saved, and that this
    information, (Good News) frees them to enjoy the blessings that are already theirs in
    Him. Most Christians believe in the atonement but do not realize that “atonement” is
    simply another word or expression for “reconciliation.” The terms are basically
    identical in both Hebrew and Greek.

    Reconciliation is not something which is to be-it is an accomplished fact, a present
    reality! It was accomplished by Jesus as His commitment to His Father God, for which
    He was duly awarded. (Philippians 2:5-11) It appears to me, that salvation is not so
    much an issue between God and man, as it is more significantly, an agreement
    between God the Father and His son, Jesus Christ. This agreement or arrangement is
    based entirely on God’s great love for the world, as indicated in John 3:16-17.The
    Scriptural basis for putting the onus almost exclusively on God is II Corinthians 5:18,
    ‘All this is from God who through Christ reconciled us (mankind), to Himself and gave
    us, (the Church) the ministry of reconciliation. (19) That God was reconciling the
    world (not just the Church) to Himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against
    them...”We Christians, in our innate preoccupation with “judgment and
    judgmentalism,” continue to hold the sins against both ourselves and others,
    erroneously expecting that this is the rule of the house, over which Christ presides
    as both Head and Cornerstone.

    It is almost as if we Christians have been and still are being raised in a home where a
    mean, intolerant, and abusive father terrorizes the children, threatening them with
    swift and painful punishment for any and every mistake made during the day, while he
    is away at work. We run to Jesus in the same manner children living in households
    with abusive and incorrigible fathers, run to their mothers for protection from him.
    These abusive and “impossible-to-please” fathers literally terrorize both the children
    and the mother, producing what psychologists call “dysfunctional homes,” (no fun in
    the unction).

    Our experience as Christians should be an unction that is enjoyable and fun!
    Christianity is not only something we endure, it should be something we enjoy. Isaiah
    12:3 says, “It is with joy that we draw water from the wells of salvation.” That is joy, not
    dread, drudgery or desperation. We must ask ourselves, “Do we need Jesus to
    protect us from God?” Or might we be presenting an inaccurate image of God, who is
    a warm, longing for and loving Father, who would spare no pains, and in fact didn’t, in
    order to reclaim His cherished family, the inheritance of His son Jesus Christ, from
    condemnation, loss and ruin?


    It has been my experience in talking with people who panic over the very term,
    “Universalism” that they immediately either connect or construe the term with
    Unitarianism, a totally different philosophy that prides itself in being a creedless
    denomination. Perhaps you can decide whether or not you are opposed to or
    offended by the results of these findings: In 1899, the general convention of
    Universalists formulated a brief statement of the five essential principles of the
    Universalist faith and the “Winchester Profession” was commended as containing
    these principles.

    They are:

    1. The Universal Fatherhood of God
    2. The spiritual authority and leadership of His Son, Jesus Christ
    3. The trustworthiness of the Bible as containing a revelation from God
    4. The certainty of just retribution for sin
    5. The final harmony of all souls with God

    “Eyes that look are common, eyes that see are rare” Plato said, “You can forgive a
    child for being afraid of the dark, it is, however, a tragedy when adults are afraid of
    light.” Rabbi Kushner in his book, How Good Must We Be? Says, “Religion is first and
    foremost, a way of seeing or perceiving things. Religion can’t always change the facts
    about the world we live in but it can change the way we perceive those facts.”

    With regard to the controversy surrounding my teachings on the Finished Work of
    redemption, I would submit that, perception is the ultimate reality, but not necessarily
    the ultimate truth. I like Barclay’s commentary on Matthew 6:22, “The light of the body
    is the eye”. He says, “Light requires an organ designed or adapted for its reception.
    Unspiritual or unregenerate man by nature is incapable of receiving spiritual light in
    as much as he lacks capacity for it. Believers, however, are called children of light,
    (Luke 16:8), not merely because they have received revelation, but because in the
    new birth, they have received the spiritual capacity for it.” It seems to me, that while
    unbelievers are blinded by the darkness, many believers today are blinded by the

    It has been said, “The difference between a prophet and a heretic is often time.” So
    called false doctrine does not necessarily make a person a heretic, but an evil heart
    can make any doctrine heretical. When you make religion your God, you lose the God
    and often the good of the religion. Many Christians have made the religion itself pre-
    eminent to Christ. They defend the religion, while ignoring or perhaps never
    experiencing the relationship. Between man’s realities and God’s absolutes, there is
    an obscure place where most people tend to get either trapped or entrapped. Our
    imprecise realities have betrayed us and, thus, alienated us from the world we are
    called to inform, love, and evangelize.

    It has taken me nearly 50 years to learn to distinguish the difference between God’s
    creations and my illusions; to know truth as God created it and not as we in our
    religious zeal have invented it. My desire is to know God totally rather than
    selectively. I’m even willing to suspend what I think I already know about God, in
    order to know Him in a way I have never imagined.

    As residents of the Kingdom of God on earth, we should seek cultural relevance in
    order to connect with the spiritually unresolved-those who are unsure and/or
    insecure concerning Faith in God or the God of our faith. A crisis in truth is a crisis in
    trust. Our role as Christians is to create environments that are conducive to the work
    of the Holy Spirit in the hearts, heads, and hurts of people. While our style and
    approach may change or experience adjustments over time or according to the times,
    the truth we preach is constant, ageless, and timeless-Jesus Christ is the Savior of
    the world!


    1 Timothy 4:9-10 says, “This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance 10.
    (and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our trust in the Living God, who is
    the Savior of all men, and especially those who believe.” If, in fact, Jesus is the
    Savior of (not just for) all men, and especially those who believe, is it not quite
    reasonable to assume that He is, in fact, the Savior of those who don’t believe, have
    never heard or perhaps didn’t hear accurately?

    The way I understand it, “Grace works without requiring anything on our part. It’s not
    expensive. It’s not even cheap. It is free.” Ephesians 2:11 says, “It is by grace you
    have been saved by faith, and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God, not by
    works so that no man can boast.

    ”Let’s pause a moment and notice Charles Spurgeon’s commentary of the
    aforementioned passage from his book,
    “By Grace Through Faith.” “I think it well to turn a little to one side that I may ask my
    reader to observe adoringly the fountainhead of our salvation, which is the grace of
    God. “By grace are ye saved”….Remember this; or you may fall into error by fixing
    your minds so much upon the faith which is the channel of salvation as to forget the
    grace which is the fountain and source even of faith itself. Faith is the work of God’s
    grace in us. No man can say that Jesus is the Christ but by the Holy Ghost. “No man
    cometh unto me,” saith the Jesus, “except the Father which hath sent me draw him.”
    So that faith, which is coming to Christ, is the result of divine drawing. Grace is the
    first and last moving cause of salvation; and faith, essential as it is, is only an
    important part of the machinery which grace employs. We are saved “through faith,”
    but salvation is “by grace,” Sound forth those words as with the archangel’s trumpet:
    “By grace are ye saved.” What glad tidings for the undeserving!”


    In some ways, faith may be more of a privilege than a requirement for salvation.As a
    born-again Christian myself, it goes without saying that believing and receiving what
    Jesus did and who He is, absolutely has a powerful affect on and influence over the
    heart and in the life of a believer; however, it does not necessarily change or effect
    the eternal destiny of the person. The ultimate destiny of the earth and God’s
    creation of the human race is all in the sovereign hands and control of the Sovereign
    and loving God.

    We must ask ourselves, does believing make a person born again or does being born
    again make you a believer? Does the Gospel make a person righteous or does it
    simply reveal a condition that is already there-a condition wrought and bought by the
    blood of Jesus Christ? I am not challenging redemption, I am challenging what act or
    fact produces the other.

    In a practical sense, would God send His son to buy our salvation and then make it
    contingent on whether or not the missionary could hear and obey the call, raise
    enough support to get a ticket to the foreign land in time to reach the lost heathen
    dying of some dread disease? Why would Jesus pay the awful and awesome price to
    save the world and then trust its reality or its realization exclusively to a group of
    western Evangelicals, who for the most part can’t even agree on the simple subject
    of water baptism or how and when to take communion, let alone with whom to take it?
    Romans 3:1-3, deals specifically with the question of faith and the imminence or pre-
    imminence of the role it plays on the part of the redeemed in relation to the ultimate
    work or act of redemption. It becomes a matter of the “works of faith” in comparison
    or perhaps in contrast, to the “faith that works”. James 2:14-26 asks the question,
    “Can faith (random) save anybody? The author’s answer suggests, “Not necessarily.”
    There is also the comment that even demons believe and shudder with fear. Later on,
    in verse 25, James calls Rahab, a non-Jewish, Canaanite prostitute, “righteous,”
    because of her faith and/or confidence in God to give them the city of Jericho.

    Verse 3 of Romans 3 ask another question regarding the role of faith in the salvation
    and identification process. He asks, “What if some did not have faith? Will their lack
    of faith nullify God’s faithfulness, (trustworthiness or credibleness)? Paul answers in
    the 4th verse, “Not at all! Let God be true and every man a liar.”

    His point is that God’s faithfulness to Himself, His Word and His ultimate Will
    regarding the redemption of the race, is not affected by man’s faith or lack of it.

    Ephesians 1:11 says, “In him, (Jesus) we were chosen, having been predestined
    according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose
    of his will." Verse 7 of that same chapter says, “In him we have redemption through
    his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace, that
    he lavished us will all wisdom and understanding.”
    The popular assumption is that Paul was speaking exclusively of Christians, with
    regard to redemption and forgiveness, but ask yourself the question, “Why would a
    loving God reserve forgiveness and redemption for only a few or a limited number of
    those he created in the world if, in fact, God so loved the entire world and is in fact
    the savior of all men?

    Is God a respecter of persons? Is he discriminatory or prejudiced toward or against
    some and not others? Is he trustworthy? Or better yet, ask yourself, “Who did Jesus
    fail to redeem in the finished work of the Cross?” “What segment of humanity was his
    blood too weak to reach and wash?”

    Who did he leave out of his Will and Purpose in “working all things out”?

    Another scripture that emphasizes God’s sovereign commitment to Himself in
    redemption is, 2 Timothy 2:13 which says, “If we are faithless, he will remain faithful,
    for he cannot disown himself.”

    Some have asked the very legitimate question, “What is the purpose or advantage of
    being a Christian or what value is there in being born again?”  As alluded to earlier,
    The Apostle Paul assumed a similar question in Romans 3:1, when he addressed what
    he thought his Jewish brethren were thinking. “What advantage then is there in
    being a Jew or what is the value of circumcision?” Paul answered, “Much in every
    way! First of all, they have been entrusted with the very words of God. “If the world is
    already saved, then what is the value of being a Christian and what is the purpose of
    being “born again”? The KJV uses the term “oracles” for the NIV’s “word”. It is in
    Greek, “Logion” and it means an utterance or oration, to be fluent, with the message.
    The Apostle calls it the “word’ or ‘message’ of reconciliation,” in 2 Corinthians 5:18-
    19. These terms are derivatives of the Greek word “logos” or in English, “logic”.
    There is a both a practical and spiritual logic to the idea of God’s plan of redemption
    for mankind. It is a workable and working plan that is in process and is God’s ultimate
    scheme or schematic for the planet-the earth project.

    My contention is that the plan works and is working. It is not a failed plan. When
    Jesus said, “It is finished!” He didn’t mean “half or partially finished.” If His reference
    was, in fact, to the redemption or reconciliation of the world to God, as indicated in II
    Corinthians 5:18-19, then my declaration of universal reconciliation and ultimate
    salvation of all is both entirely Scriptural and entirely logical.

    We all sing the words of the song, “Lift Him Up.” Notice the lyrics: “How to reach the
    masses, men of every birth, for the answer Jesus gave the Key. He said if I, If I be
    lifted up from the earth, I’ll draw all men unto me.”
    If, in fact, “all” means “all”, then there should be no real question here. Mind you, we
    are not just quoting a song; we are literally singing Scripture from the Gospel of John
    chapter 12 verse 32. Unless you interpret the word “all” as, some, a few, or, only
    those who accept or believe it, then it, (all) is a very inclusive term that excludes

    Isaiah 53:6 says, “All we like sheep have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
    own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all”. Again, if we believe that
    reference to be in particular to Jews, but in general to “us all,” then the penalty or
    punishment for sin has been paid by Jesus. The debt is paid and, thus, cancelled, and
    we are free to live the life of the redeemed and to, as the Scripture says, “say so!”
    (Psalm 107:2)

    Another point regarding the John 12:32 reference, to Jesus stating when lifted up, He
    would “draw” all men (mankind) into Himself. The word draw as here used in the
    original Greek is the word helkuo, and it means literally, to drag. The word occurs in
    this particular tense only four times in the NT.

    According to Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, it is probably akin to the word,
    “aihreomai”, which means “to take for oneself”, to “choose or prefer”. It can be
    compared to the word helisso, which means, “to coil, wrap, fold up or roll together”,
    (like a package). This particular use of the word only appears four times in the NT and
    in each case, the object being drawn is either unwilling, (James 2:6), inanimate, (John
    21:6) or perhaps unaware, ( John 6:44 and John 12:32).
    Again, the onus is put and kept upon the Sovereignty of God, rather than the fickle
    and/or inconsistent will of man.


    Romans 3:23-24 says, “...all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.” and are
    justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came (past tense) by Christ
    ”...The law of God condemns us all until, while we are still sinners, grace comes and
    liberates us from it’s curse without a single condition attached; no improvements
    demanded, no promises extorted, just the extravagant, outrageous, hilarious
    absurdity of free grace and dying love.” (Capon) Robert Farrar Capon is an Episcopal
    priest from New York.

    One of the accusations attributed to my “Gospel of Inclusion” is that it is a new
    heresy espoused by those influenced by the end-time or last days’ doctrines of
    demons mentioned by Paul in his 1st letter to Timothy, in Chapter 4 verses 1-5.
    However, it has been my happy experience to learn that the idea of the ultimate
    salvation of all was the prevailing theological posture of the first 400 to 500 years of
    Christian Church history. It was the prevailing doctrine in Christendom as long as
    Greek, the language of the New Testament, was the language of Christendom.
    According to Dr. J. W. Hanson in his book, “Universalism the Prevailing Doctrine,” the
    first comparatively complete systematic statement of Christian doctrine ever given to
    the world was by Clement of Alexandria, A.D. 180, and universal salvation was one of
    the tenets.

    Clement declared that all punishment, however severe, is purificatory; that even the
    “torments of the damned” are curative. Origen, another of the early church fathers
    explains even Gehenna as signifying limited and curative punishment, and both, as
    all other ancient Universalists, declare the ‘everlasting’ (aionion) punishment, is
    consonant with universal salvation.
    To quote Clements of Alexandria, “He saves ALL universally, but some are converted
    by punishment, others by voluntary submission.”

    Universalism was generally believed in the best centuries, (the first three, when
    Christians were most remarkable) for simplicity, goodness and missionary zeal. With
    the exception of the arguments of Augustine, (A.D. 420), there is not an argument
    known to have been framed against Universalism for at least 400 years after Christ,
    by any of the ancient fathers. All ecclesiastical historians and the best Biblical critics
    and scholars agree to the prevalence of Universalism in the earlier centuries. From
    the days of Clement of Alexandria, to those of Gregory of Nyssa and Theodoret of
    Mopsuestia (A.D. 180-428), the great theologians and teachers, almost without
    exception, were Universalists. The first theological school in Christendom, that being
    in Alexandria, taught Universalism for more than 200 years.

    To quote Clement again, We can set no limits to the agency of the Redeemer: to
    redeem, to rescue, to discipline, in his work, and so will he continue to operate after
    this life” “All men are his....for either the Lord does not care for all men...or he does
    care for all. For he is savior; not of some and for others not...and how is He savior
    and Lord, if not the savior and Lord of all? For all things are arranged with a view to
    the salvation of the universe by the Lord of the universe both generally and

    It appears to me that the early church fathers were not only advocates of the doctrine
    of universal reconciliation but, also of “Ultimate reconciliation” as well. Gregory of
    Nyssa said, “All punishments are means of purification, ordained by Divine Love to
    purge rational beings from moral evil and to restore them back to communion with

    “....God would not have permitted the experience of hell unless He had foreseen
    through redemption, that all rational beings would, in the end, attain to the same
    blessed fellowship with Himself.”
    Let’s ponder for a moment, the way Mr. Capon closes the above quotation, He says,
    that all rational beings would “in the end,” attain to the same blessed fellowship with

    The issue of “Final Things” or the eschatology of the fear-based theologies of the
    world’s religions, including Christianity, seems to be the overriding struggle
    paralyzing their adherents in horror and debilitating insecurity concerning how this
    entire scenario will ultimately turn out. If you doubt the outcome, you inevitably doubt
    the out-from. If you cannot and do not trust the Author, then you will not trust the
    Finisher of our Faith.

    Revelations 22:13 says, “I am the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the
    beginning and the end.”

    Most people don’t have difficulty beginning or starting a thing, whether marriage,
    business or ministry-it is the completion of the thing that seems to be the great
    paradox of choice.

    The great question seems to remain, “How will this all end? What will be the final
    outcome of this intriguing ordeal we call Life?” God, who is omniscient, knew from
    the day He created man in His image and likeness, what man was capable of doing
    and what he would, in actuality, do. The scripture says Jesus is the Lamb slain before
    the foundation of the world. (Revelations 13:8)

    In Luke 10:17-20, Jesus tells His disciples to rejoice, not because demons are subject
    to them in His name, but because their names were written in heaven. Since this took
    place before the Cross or resurrection, how were their names already written? And
    who could have written them but God himself perhaps in creation or before it. The
    suggestion must be that this entire issue of the redemption of humankind to God was
    discussed and decided before the foundation of the world.

    Capon explains it like this: “In God the end is fully present in the beginning; the
    beginning is fully realized in the end. He didn’t have to change his mind, drop a
    stitch, pull out a row, reverse engines or slam on his brakes.”

    The sins of Adam and Eve in the garden didn’t shock heaven and throw it into chaos.
    The Master plan was already in place and there was a natural flow of response by God’
    s power and Grace.

    The book of Revelation ends with the masses of humanity “cast into the lake which
    burns with fire and brimstone: which is the SECOND death” (Revelation 21:8)  Even
    before John received his revelation, Paul writes the ultimate response to the
    question of death, the first or second. He says in 1 Corinthians 15:26 that the last
    enemy to be destroyed, (rendered inoperative) is death. Could that statement by the
    Apostle include the ultimate victory of Christ’s blood even over the Lake of fire, the
    second death?

    The Greek word for brimstone is “Theion” and it means flashing/sulphur. It is a
    derivative of the word “Theios” which means “godlike or in the neuter, divinity.” Both
    these words are derivatives of the Greek word, “Theos” which means “deity or God.”
    If the lake of fire is burning with divinity or god-likeness, or perhaps God Himself as a
    purifying agency, then the ultimate triumph of Christ over the last enemy is that much
    more logical.

    The purging power of God in the flames of the Lake of fire, into which all remaining
    impurities are purged, means we can rejoice in the ultimate declaration of Paul in 1
    Corinthians 15:55, which was a repeat of the words of the Prophet Hosea (Hosea 13:
    14), “Where O death is your victory? Where O death is your sting? The sting of death
    is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory
    through our Lord Jesus Christ.

    “Where O death is your victory? Where O death is your sting?” The power of death is
    sin (washed away by the blood, John 1:29) and the power of sin is the law (abolished
    now by Jesus, Ephesians 2:15). But, thanks be to God! He gives us the victory though
    our Lord Jesus Christ!

    The question posed to death (grave) infers it has lost its victory or its triumph. And
    death has lost its sting, which means in effect, its poison or toxicity its lethality.
    Through the cross, death has been defanged and defrocked. It literally has no power
    whatsoever! Hebrews 2:14-15 suggests that death has been neutralized, literally put
    out of a job, or lost its original functionality. The question Paul poses to death and the
    grave in the Corinthian passage is, in effect, a mockery of death. It literally pokes fun
    at death like children do to each other when one loses a game on a school
    playground. “Ha, ha, ha, death has lost its victory.” It kind of reminds me of the song
    the munchkins sing in the movie “The Wizard of Oz” after the menacing wicked witch
    of the West dies: “Ding Dong the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead.”

    The utility that gave death its sting (sin) has been cancelled, “Behold the Lamb of
    God who takes away (expiates) the sin of the world” John 1:29 and 2 Corinthians 5:19.
    And the utility that gave sin its power (law) has been both fulfilled in Jesus (Matthew
    5:17-20, Colossians 2:13-15) and abolished in His flesh (Ephesians 2:15).

    If, in fact, Jesus nailed the law (with us) to the cross as recorded in the Colossian
    passage, then the punishment for sin has been assumed by Jesus; thus making hell
    or any further punitive action irrelevant, except perhaps for its curative value.
    Except for some form of corrective significance of purgation (purging) as inferred by
    some of the early church fathers, the way I see it, hell will have no significance in the
    ultimate finality of God’s plan for a peace prevailing eternity where every knee bows
    and every tongue confesses the Lordship of Christ.

    Many scholars interpret the word “punishment” used in Matthew 25:46 (kolasin in
    Greek) to mean purgative or curative.

    In Revelations 20:12-14, an emptied death and an emptied hell is cast into the lake of
    fire, which proves it’s (hell’s) limitation. As pointed out earlier, the lake of fire will,
    more than likely, have an awesome as well as, if you insist, awful purifying effect. It
    will, in effect, burn off any remaining dross of unbelief, rebellion or disobedience.
    Remember, even those “under the earth” will proclaim the Lordship of Christ and
    bow their knees to his Excellency. (Philippians 2:9-11)

    In closing, many may find it difficult to see a totally triumphant Christ, but I don’t. I
    believe with all my heart that the Last Adam far exceeds in efficacy the first one. I
    believe as well, Jesus is in fact superior to Adam and that the better covenant with
    better promises are exactly that. (Hebrews 8:6).

    I realize that much of what I say is a real stretch for most believers, even the
    nontraditional ones. However, if you want or choose to believe in a more “excellent
    way” and a completely victorious church, headed by a completely victorious Christ,
    then what you’ve just read will resonate with your spirit, even it if initially troubles
    your mind.

    My prayer is that you will give it serious and prayerful consideration as something
    sent of God, revealed in this particular season and prepared for a 21st century
    harvest of souls and Kingdom advancements unprecedented since Pentecost and
    the days of the 1st century Pauline Epistles.

    Carlton Pearson is a minister from Tulsa, OK.  Reading one of his articles on the
    message of reconciliation was my first introduction to the message.  

    He calls what he preaches "The Gospel of Inclusion".  

    I believe the gospel does include everyone. And that means all people, all religions, all
    lifestyles, will eventually come into submission to Jesus Christ. I still believe in taking a
    stand for what is right and for what the Bible teaches as acceptable behavior and for
    avoiding the things the Bible takes a stand against.

    I'm sure I don't agree with all of Mr. Pearson's involvments now-a-days but how he
    ministers is between him and God.